Posts Tagged ‘podcasts’

Reveiew of ‘podcasts’: BBC live Tour

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

Here is another new media way to enjoy the Tour de France. It’s a contradiction in terms, because it isn’t a podcast, it’s a live feed from the BBC website.

Every day the BBC Tour de France reporter Peter Slater commentates on the last hour or two of every stage, and this feed is available via the cycling section of the BBC website. There are no podcast downloads, but it’s a good way to keep up with the race as it happens, if you can’t watch it on tv or sit watching twitter all afternoon.

Incidentally, 5Livecycling has a twitter that has appeared this year. According to the Name and Bio it is manned by Phil Sheehan, who is a producer, presumably out there in France working with Peter Slater. There are so many twitter accounts out there already, that provide live race updates, snippets of pro news, and pithy comment, that this one doesn’t seem to add much other than to promote the commentary and point to new articles on BBC- sorry.

The live commentary is interspersed with snappy sections every half hour, where Slater gives his update to 5Live news. This isn’t explained which can be a bit confusing for the listener. Why not give us a feel of exclusive, behind-the-scenes broadcasting rather than papering over the reality?

The other person in the equation is Graham Jones, a former British racing great, race director of the Tour of Britain, and sometime podcaster himself (more on that later). His analysis is very good as you would expect, although the style is quite muted. Perfect for me actually, as I sometimes listen with half an ear on the feed while working.

  • Share/Bookmark

Review of podcasts: Procycling

Monday, July 5th, 2010

With the Tour de France on, there are a few podcasts that suddenly pop out of the woodwork.

During the Tour, the cyclingnews podcast transmogrifies into a daily download under the banner of Procycling, which is the print stablemate of cyclingnews, under the Future Publishing banner.

Those who dislike the regular podcast (see comments in my cyclingnews review) would do well to check it out again as it’s very different.

You have the host, Daniel Friebe who is the Procycling editor, along with author and journalist Richard Moore, who should be well known to Scottish cycling fans. This year they have a cyclingnews reporter Anthony Tan, a lively Aussie who I haven’t heard of before.

The style is lively and loose, and a bit more fun and free flowing than cyclingnews. There’s a bit of light hearted banter, in-jokes and ribbing, which might not be to everyone’s taste but I find it entertaining rather than annoying.

More importantly they have good access to the riders and bring good quality audio clips. The analysis is really good to my eyes, although being somewhat of a novice armchair fan I’m not really qualified to pick holes in it.

Only complaint is that it is a bit tardy in the release: Velocast’s daily tour updates and itv.com (more on them soon) are available on the same day of the stage, whereas Procycling is usually a day later. In today’s era of real-time updates on twitter and the web, and bloggers all over the world giving their commentary, you’ve got to be as immediate as possible with this sort of thing.
perhaps it’s what I remember from last year, or that I’m influenced by cyclingnews’ somewhat irregular schedule, but I need to take this last comment back- tonight the 2nd podcast is live on the same day of the stage.

Links
Procycling podcast on the web
On iTunes

  • Share/Bookmark

Review of cycling podcasts: Carrément Vélo

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

The Tour de France approaches, so for my latest podcast review, it’s time to cover something French.

It’s a French cycling podcast from commercial radio station RTL-l’Équipe, and the quality of the show is what you’d expect- no sound issues for example. In addition to the download, the show is broadcast live and online every Monday 11am-12pm, and repeated again on Monday afternoons. It may be showing off a bit to declare that I listen to this- I can pick up most of the discussion, although inevitably quite a bit passes me by. If you can understand French though, I’d rate it as must-listen.

The show is expertly chaired by RTL host Emmanuel Barth, who manages the various personalities well and gets the best out of them, fostering at times heated debate about the professional road racing scene. This typical French polemique, the kind you’d find in the bar or around the dinner table, is imbued with a passion that can put British discussion to shame at times.

The guests vary but the line-up tends to revolve around a squad of regulars:

Cycling journalist Jean-Paul Brouchon, seems to have something of the bon viveur about him. He comes across as a vastly experienced voice of reason, but one who will also curtly criticise where he sees fit. Pierre Salviac, erstwhile rugby commentator, plays the part of irascible agent provocateur, the grande gueule or ‘big mouth’. Velo Magazine journalist Nicolas Perthuis is a quieter personality but one who really knows his stuff. You also have Frédéric Millet, from “Le Cycle” magazine

The interviews are unsurprisingly all French riders, but there is no shortage of protour guys who are willing to come on the show and discuss in some detail their training regimes, contract situations, form and race schedules. Interviews have included Pierrick Fedrigo, Christophe le Mevel, Christophe Moreau, and Nicholas Vogondy. Host Emmanuel Barth is also is not afraid to press the interviewees with difficult questions and allows the contributors to do so also, which is wonderfully refreshing. I find that in the UK or USA, interviewers seem to be afraid to upset the stars or lose their grip on their contacts, which sometimes leads to a timid style of interviewing.

For example:
How can Pierrick Fedrigo say he can’t win a classic after winning the Criterium International?! Well… Pierrick?
Nicholas Vogondy doesn’t really have a speciality… Nicholas: what do you say?
etc

Links
RTL-l’Équipe podcasts page
Subscribe on itunes
Subscribe via RSS
Facebook page

  • Share/Bookmark

Review of podcasts: Veloreviews

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

This is a new podcast, that has been finding its feet a little bit. It has a very welcoming, inclusive feel that I don’t think this is a symptom of it’s youth- there is a deliberately anti-elitist ethos there that is intended to tie in with the Veloreviews website and community forum.

If you are not a fan of pro cycling news and comment, and can’t be bothered with the nuances of bike culture and the various sub-niches within cycling, this is the podcast for you. As I see it, the ideal listener is mainly into riding and buying bits for their own bike, as well as improving their fitness, rather than wondering why last year’s Paris-Roubaix runner-up is is running a carbon or aluminium bottle cages this year.

The podcast is a supplement to the Veloreviews.com website and community, which have dipped into and seems cool. It’s the sort of thing that is working to build up long-term relationships and a resource of really useful information. The presenters of the podcast all interact on the Veloreviews forum, giving fitness, mechanics and product advice.

The interviews are pretty good but tend to push the episode length way up. Neil Browne was good as always, ditto Fun Run Robbie, great to hear a popular twitter user getting time ‘on air’. The podcast is looking to interview Veloreviews.com community members which I think is great in my opinion.

The fitness section is also good- they have Al Painter, a coach from Integrate Fitness, to answer listener emails and once they get going, there’s some very good, in depth bike-fit and biomechanical advice.

The Pro bike wrench segment, with experienced mechanic Josh Boggs (@probikewrench), is great for learning maintenance, and again Veloreviews is building a strong community by answering listener’s questions. Josh is also pretty experienced in bike fit.

I don’t want to descend into personal abuse but after listening to Velocast and Real Peloton, the bar for funny and engaging presentation has been raised, and Veloreviews does move along pretty slowly. I feel bad to say this but Jeff Helfand does sound a bit like he is about to fall asleep at times and Boggs’ southern drawl, while charming, makes me want to go for a relaxing beer rather than concentrate on his excellent bike maintenance tips.

I rediscovered my passion for cycling two years ago and have learnt a massive amount in that time. Without sounding bigheaded I already feel I have outgrown a few podcasts that tend to over-explain things or aim at the beginner/intermediate. There are still really useful points that I have taken away from this show, but I’m not sure I’ll be listening every single week.

Another negative point for me is that the chat is very friendly (as would befit an inclusive community podcast), but being a lewd and foul-mouthed Scot I prefer my banter a little edgier, along the lines of Velocast, Real Peloton and Two Johns.

Links
Veloreviews website
Subscribe on iTunes
Jeff Helfand/Veloreviews twitter
Al Painter Integrate Fitness
Josh Boggs the Pro Bike Wrench
Jen Moore

  • Share/Bookmark

Review of podcasts: Bicycle Radio

Saturday, May 1st, 2010

Broadcast as a one-hour live show at 7pm Central Time on Tuesday nights, Bicycle Radio has slick production in a fun format held together by host Sean Mellor. I believe it was originally some sort of ESPN show, but don’t know how the show is funded now. I certainly don’t hear any advertising/infomercials although there is an emerging product shop on the associated website that they are calling Bicycle Radio 3.0.

The biggest plus point of this show is the live format, which gives it a vibrant, fast-paced feel, and the anchor host, Sean Mellor who is very professional while retaining a relaxed style. It rattles along, keeping things to an hour long, and providing plenty of light hearted banter along the way.

It does try to cover a lot of bases, and Larry, one of the show’s hosts makes a joke of the slight bias toward pro news and road cycling. Efraim Rojas’ ‘Weekly dose of pro’ is informed and incisive though, but unsurprisingly it does focus on American interest. No problem with that though. However do I find the pro news from other podcasts- Velocast, Real Peloton and cyclingnews – dig a bit deeper into the issues.

Something I’m not so keen on is the over-use of trails, sound effects, background music and other gimmickry. The catchphrases and names for the various slots are particularly unnecessary for me- “the Cat. 5 Tattoo studios”, “Bicycle Radio escapees” and “news from the bike begone trail”. What’s that all about?

Background music has been used in a humorous way, and sometimes it is funny but sometimes I feel like it’s just not needed. I think this bugged a lot of listeners too, and they have cut down on it in recent weeks.

The show interacts well with the listeners on twitter and even takes live calls. Most weeks there are interesting interviews, normally with people in pro bike racing or the bike industry, but unsurprisingly these are US-centric rather than providing much international interest.

Another very interesting aspect is the view from novice female racer Jerri Manley. She shares her experiences, from training, fitness and nutrition, to racecraft, which can demystify them for other riders starting out. It’s all done in a fun way too- not too serious or geeky.

Overall verdict? It’s good but not quite compelling listening for me. I’m still subscribed but it’s not on my not-to-be-missed list. The style is a very big factor in whether you’ll like it. The humour and banter is pretty entertaining but sometimes there are too many voices in the studio. The production is pretty much the best amongst cycling podcasts.

Links
Bicycle radio website
Subscribe on itunes
Bicycle radio twitter
Jerri Manley twitter
Efraim Rojas twitter

  • Share/Bookmark

How to make money from a cycling podcast

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

I’ve heard on the podcast airwaves, presenters musing over ways to fund their show, and show hosts admitting to feeling jaded and pondering whether the time has come to hang up their mic. I’m a cycling podcast addict, and want these shows to keep going, so here I list 10 ways to make money from a cycling podcast. I can’t call these ideas or suggestions, as they are all being used in one way or another, somewhere across the airwaves/internets.

1. Rely on goodwill
Like the Two Johns, Velocast or Fredcast, you can ask listeners to donate voluntarily. This may or may not get you very far. Scott Velocast’s ‘$1, which is less than the price of a coffee’ is a pretty good call to action.

2. Pimp yourself to the advertisers
Fredcast has it’s detractors, but it’s the most popular one out there (I’m guessing, without having access to the stats). To appeal to advertisers you have to have a lot of listeners, and David Bernstein achieves that. The downside (if you want to look at it that way) is you need to aim for a broad appeal. You also might feel more pressure to record a show more regularly, although Fredcast David still takes breaks when life intervenes.

3. Get into bed with retailers
Veloreviews has a premium members model, where for $35, subscribers get access to trade prices on cycling products.

4. Be part of something commercial
Cyclingnews, RTL-l’Équipe and the dreaded Guardian The Bike Podcast are offshoots of commercial news websites. Listeners to the show can be directed to the site, or at the very least be exposed to ‘brand awareness’, which may bring a few more hits to the main site, and thus stats for paying advertisers. Could an independent podcast sell itself to a commercial publisher without alienating the listeners? e.g The Edinburgh Bicycle Co-Op Velocast, or the Eurosport Real Peloton podcast?

5. Sell stuff
The Two Johns sell coffee and T-Shirts. Fredcast sells cycling jerseys (and other stuff I can’t remember). Velocast dipped its toe in the merchandise water. Merchandise would have to be promoted in the show and online, and I get the impression show hosts are a little wary to push stuff on their listeners. Don’t be! See it as a kind of donation, where the donater gets something in return.

6. Paid content
Charging for access to your podcast is not a good idea. Hardly anybody will fork out to listen to it. The Veloreviews subscriber system doesn’t fall foul of this though, instead offering additional content and benefits to paid-up members. Other podcasts spring to mind, such as the Lingua Networks series of Coffee Break Spanish/French/etc language learning shows, which offer PDF downloads, supplementary podcasts and other premium content. What’s worth offering as premium content? Audio interviews, video, photography, articles? The downside is the IT work needed to manage member log-ins and all that stuff.

7. Use it as a stepping stone
Using the podcast as a stepping stone to some sort of commercial gig, e.g a tv or online commentating job. You probably already need to be a famous name to make it in that business though. You might be a writer, a fitness coach, or a marketing person who could get a foothold into the cycling industry through your show. Two Johns’ John G is a local race announcer, although I doubt he makes much from that and would expect he does it for the love of the sport. He has worked on the Tour of Georgia though, a big race in the USA, doing TV interviews and things.

8. Get funding
The Bike Show is broadcast on Resonance FM which is funded partly by donations but also gets funding, presumably arts council or similar.

9. Be in the cycling business
In Will Fotherinham’s biography of Tom Simpson, Tom was a pioneer living and racing on the continent. He ran some sort of lodgings in Belgium and encouraged British guys to come over (If I Remember Correctly). More British riders in Belgium, meant more interest in cycling back home, which meant more interest in him, as the top British cyclist, and therefore more likely to get sponsors and contracts. More people listening to and participating in cycling podcasts, means more people cycling, or consuming cycling media, which oils the gears of the cycling industry.

10
I was already clutching at straws with 9, so I’ll stop there. You can make more suggestions…

  • Share/Bookmark

Review of Podcasts: The Bike Show

Friday, March 26th, 2010

Jack Thurston presents The Bike Show on London community radio station Resonance 104.4FM. The show takes a relatively broad brush approach to topics, but its first loves are touring, the fixed gear scene, and urban cycling.

The Bike Show logo

Mr Thurston, as a presenter, is well practised and professional while retaining a friendly, personal feel. The show goes out live but it has none of the frantic feel of other live shows. I would characterise it as having a typically English feel- it takes it’s time to get to the nub of things. Where it criticises it is polite and constructive, and while it knows what it doesn’t like (badly designed public spaces for example), there’s no place for a Sod Off Corner here.

The podcast is very different to the other shows out there, and it’s biggest asset is that it takes its time and delves into detail. Jack will get his teeth into a topic, without being distracted by topical news. My friend Andy described it as the Rouleur of cycling podcasts- printed on good quality paper stock, and I think this is a pretty good description. It’s one to savour, to keep and to listen to again.

He is a good interviewer, being able to get great commentary out of diverse people ranging from Cycling Weekly journalist Lionel Birnie and pro team manager John Herety, to eccentrics at bike jumble sales and random cycle tourers he meets on the train up to Edinburgh.

The podcast archive is a great resource. Because the shows don’t tend to focus on topical news that dates over time, many of the shows are still a really good listen. I only discovered this podcast in late 2009 and since then I have been working my way through the archives, which date back to 2005. If I have a criticism, it would be that the content isn’t always to my taste, but that isn’t exactly a failing. Whenever a cycling podcast says “we won’t talk about the Tour de France/pro racing/etc for too long, because that might not be your cup of tea…” my heart sinks!

One gem of a show that I listened to recently interviewed Peter Woods, who had produced a radio documentary for Irish station RTÉ on an Irish bike racer from the 50s and 60s – Mick Murphy aka “The Iron Man”. This extraordinary man tells tales of drinking cow’s blood, his home-made gym, stealing a bike during The Ras, winning The Ras, and his ultra-attacking riding style. The full Mick Murphy RTE documentary (mp3) is archived on the RTÉ site and still worth a listen if you can understand the accent!

Other highlights include two shows featuring the now-deceased cycling guru Sheldon Brown – one in 2005 and another in 2006 with Sheldon’s typically encyclopaedic knowledge of fixed gears and gear ratios.

Oh and the music’s great, sprinklings of high quality reggae and soul as well as some more unusual bike-themed tracks. A nod to Le Guape’s cycling podcast review, that itself nodded to me and spurred me to getting round to reviewing this podcast.

Links
The Bike Show website and full archives
Bike Show on iTunes

  • Share/Bookmark

Review of podcasts: Real Peloton

Friday, March 12th, 2010

The Real Peloton podcast has reached it’s 10th episode. A review is long overdue, so, inspired by a blog post by Alex Murray (@leguape), who was inspired by my cycling podcast reviews, I have got my act together.

It’s hosted by Ned Boulting (ITV football/cycling presenter) and Matt Rendell (writer, journalist, Eurosport commentator). First of all, the podcast has a well-balanced mixture of presentation styles: it clearly benefits from (where some other podcasts fail) from Ned’s experience as a professional presenter, but it has a strong vein of banter, sarcasm and tomfoolery to keep it relaxed. The personality comes through and they seem to really enjoy doing it (which occasionally can’t be said for other ‘casts).

The production has been truly shoddy at times but all of that is excused because of the content. Interviews with Cavendish, Haussler, Gilbert and others have left the pro cycling fan drooling for more. The fact that the sound quality varies doesn’t matter. People have complained that the cyclingnews podcast could improve greatly by adding more interviews. In their defence, Daniel Benson tweeted me, saying that phone quality is poor but if the Two Johns, Velocast, Fredcast and Bicycle Radio can do it over skype…

No review would be complete without a mention of ‘Sod Off Corner’, the part of the show where Matt and Ned lambast the latest liar or dope cheat to emerge from the pro peloton. While vilifying banned riders isn’t always the best way to challenge the doping problem, it’s refreshing (and entertaining) to see two professional journalists laying it bare with no holds barred. After all, there is still work to do to change the doping culture in cycling, to get to the point where it is totally unacceptable. Matt and Ned have hinted that Sod Off Corner may itself be cast into Sod Off Corner, which may be a bit too self-referential but shows the whole show does not take it too seriously.

Criticisms — did I mention the sound quality, mislaid music, dodgy edits and repeated segments? None of that really matters for me though — I prefer my podcasts a lot less polished but with something of substance at the heart. The humour is something that might not be to everyone’s taste — healthy doses of sarcasm and irony, sometimes might try to be a bit too clever, but these are minor gripes.

It’s clear that this podcast was not a flash in the pan though and has taken the UK podcast market (is there a ‘market’?) by storm — in only one or two episodes it had generated quite a buzz. Please leave a comment, but most people who read my blog have already said what they wanted to say in my tirade against the Guardian Bike Podcast.

Key words:
Sod Off
Woof woof! Rar rar!
Vackin brillian

Links
Real Peloton website
iTunes feed

  • Share/Bookmark

Review of podcasts: Cyclingnews

Friday, February 19th, 2010

A lot of views were aired about the Cyclingnews podcast in this comments section under my post about the Guardian podcast. In summary: could and should do much better.

This podcast offers good insights and news about the pro scene. However it focuses only on pro news, and since most other podcasts cover this too, the big let-down is that with the journalistic access I assume they have, that these insights don’t go deeper. Cyclingnews should be trumping most other podcasts for news, interviews and inside scoops.

At 30-40 minutes the podcast is a nice length but could allow itself to be a little longer. One big failing of many podcasts is padding a show out to an hour and a half or more with interviews. In Cyclingnews’ case this would not be a problem– with their contact book they should be able to bring fans really close to pro riders, DSs, mechanics or even soigneurs. A case in point – Daniel Benson spent a week on the Garmin Transitions training camp and didn’t come back with any audio to share with us! Perhaps they are keeping it all for website articles, but then again I’m not sure he’d be the best interviewer. (sorry)

I spoke to Richard Moore last year and told him I enjoyed the banter on the Cyclingnews Tour de France shows. At times you could tell they were recording it in a noisy café or parked car, but that didn’t matter. Richard was surprised — he said they’d thought about toning down the combative style. But for me, the interaction of personalities, Richard taking the ‘extreme’ viewpoint at times, and the light hearted ribbing of Daniel Friebe made for great listening. The Cyclingnews podcast is normally lacking in this department, although it came through a little in the most recent show during the discussion about blood values. Daniel Benson tweeted that there are more of these shows to come, which I will look forward to.

The presentation is a bit of a problem though. At times Daniel Benson and Jeff Jones sound as if it’s a bit of a chore to do the podcast. Once they get going it can be very good, getting into the nitty-gritty of pro racers form, race tactics and peloton personalities. But at other times it can come across as stumbling and the humour can let it down- it’s more between the presenters than for the listeners. The humour bar is set pretty high by the Johns, Velocast and now Matt & Ned. Another point- I’ve said elsewhere that I don’t mind podcasts being rough around the edges, but Cyclingnews is a marquee publisher and I think my expectations are actually for something a little more polished.

My suspicion that Benson & Jones are best as print/web journalists and not as broadcast journalists. The Real Peloton has burst onto the scene and proved how engaging two TV presenters can be.

Last thing- while we have seen the Johns set the benchmark for listener interaction, and the Velocast and RealPeloton rapidly evolve, trying new things, the Cyclingews podcast does remain quite a static format. A few listener emails or a bit more tweeting wouldn’t go amiss. I guess Bikeradar is a pretty thriving community, so they’ve got that angle covered.

In summary
Bring us some interviews and don’t save all the good stuff for the website
Try to sound a bit more exciting…

Links
http://www.cyclingnews.com/
Cyclingnews podcast
On iTunes

  • Share/Bookmark

Review of podcasts: The Velocast

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

I think the Velocast is my favourite podcast. The bar has been raised by certain newcomers (see future blog posts), but for now, it’s my number one. It covers a balance of pro news, urban and general interest stories with a personal feel.

Disclosure- the Velocast has connections near to me and I hope to one day meet John and Scott for a pint. They have also been nice to me on twitter and things. Further disclaimer- I do relate to the humour and ethos (1) because they’re Scottish and (2) because they’re British, but I don’t find (2) applies to other UK podcasts by default- you have to some personality to go with it.

Do I relate because they are Scots? I am a big fan of the Millars, Robert and David, and by some accounts those two could be gits at times. I’m not saying the Velocast guys are gits here, (quite the opposite) merely that things I like in cycling can at times be clouded by a patriotic bent.

As said before, the personalities make the show. When one podcast finishes, I feel I want to chat to these two for another hour. I have been known to restart my iPod and listen again. I’m sounding more and more like a fanboy but that’s how it is.

Criticisms- they keep the show under an hour (deliberately I believe), which is good in a way, but I’d be happy to have a wee bit more. The more I appreciate their knowledge on pro racing, mechanics and bikes, the more the ‘daft stories’ seem to take up too much of the precious hour. I only have myself to blame- I’ve forwarded links to them of picnic table bikes and the like. Their background knowledge and insight impresses me more and more over time, so to make best use of this I might have a little more pro chat. I’m sure they reign in the techie/bike bits/maintenance chat for fear of boring the listeners but this stuff is gold because the knowledge is so in-depth. Weird- a criticism paragraph turned itself into a compliment.

The delivery works for me as well- not too polished (ref Fredcast), but not stumbling or dull (ref cyclingnews).

There is laugh-out-loud humour (for me anyway). John’s unintended “for sea fights” pun that tripped up Scott was a classic moment. (see Two Ronnies “Four candles” sketch). Double entendres can be seen as cheap gags but they are a staple of British comedy: “getting used to the extra length” of a tandem had me biting my lip behind my desk at work. Then there’s the plain bizarre (Monty Python style) “sharing Gary Fisher’s facial hair; I get it Monday/Tuesday/Wednesday, then post it back to him”.

So thanks to Scott and John for such an enjoyable show.

Keywords
All joking aside
Couldn’t agree more
Moving on
It’s an iPhone app

Links
Velocast twitter
Velocast website
iTunes stream

  • Share/Bookmark